MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385989136 · doi:10.1063/5.0161925

General rigid bead-rod theory for steady-shear flow

2023· article· en· W4385989136 on OpenAlexafffund
A. Jeffrey Giacomin, S. J. Coombs, Myong Chol Pak, Kwang-Il Kim

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicRheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsShear flowNewtonian fluidMechanicsRotational symmetryShear (geology)ViscosityClassical mechanicsFlow (mathematics)DiffusionGeneralized Newtonian fluidShear stressThermodynamicsShear rateMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

General rigid bead-rod theory yields uniquely the relation between macromolecular architecture and complex viscosity. For this, it relies on the analytical solution of the general diffusion equation for small-amplitude oscillatory shear flow of Bird et al. [Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1987), Vols. 1–2]. Unfortunately, this general diffusion equation has yet to be solved for any other flow field. In this paper, we do so for steady-shear material functions, namely, viscosity and first normal stress coefficient. We, thus, explain the non-Newtonian behaviors of macromolecular suspensions of any axisymmetric design in steady-shear flow.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score0.585

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicRheology and Fluid Dynamics StudiesFrench-language works237,207