Registro empresarial: Política de desenvolvimento econômico e adaptação institucional
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Federal Constitution of 1988 raised private business activity as an indispensable element for achieving the primacy established by the economic and social order. In turn, the participation of the State in the economy, especially through the legal regulation of economic activity, gained new contours from the middle of the first quarter of the 20th century, so that a market economy system averse to state regulation is no longer conceived. In this conformation, the analysis of the business register – a necessary act for the regular and formal exercise of business activity by the private agent - is proposed as a mechanism to induce development and, therefore, able to integrate the political agenda of the Brazilian State, through the tool of institutional adaptation. The article uses the deductive method to conclude that business register must be an element of attraction and encouragement to the private agent, and not an entry barrier to entrepreneurship. Through the institutional adaptation policy, the rules of business registration also need to reflect the State’s commitment to create conditions for the free exercise of business activity, since it is determinant to the country’s economic and social development, as indicated by the recent legislative changes promoted, like the Law 13.874/2019 – Economic Freedom Act – and Law 14.195/2021 – Business Environment Law.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".