MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385990604 · doi:10.1080/15240657.2023.2204802

a shared fate (face)

2023· article· en· W4385990604 on OpenAlexaff
Trish Salah

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Gender and Sexuality · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGeographies of human-animal interactions
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDestiny (ISS module)FeelingContradictionFace (sociological concept)Futures contractPsychoanalysisUnconscious mindAestheticsSociologyPsychologyEpistemologyPhilosophySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

If today the idea of the multiverse is ”everywhere” and “everything” and “all at once,” then in the overlay of physics and comic books, it seems we are never far from an unconscious that knows no “no,” nor time, nor contradiction. Or, if neither biology nor nation manifests destiny, how does the feeling of fatedness haunt, or give retroactive continuity to, the bad futures we make of our lives, deaths, one another’s? What then of that shadowy feeling that falls across aspirations, like memory, but something older and farther away, something promised that remains intimately obscure?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.252
GPT teacher head0.468
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in Gender and SexualitySame topicGeographies of human-animal interactionsFrench-language works237,207