Exploring the role of supplier integration, customer integration on operational performance by mediating the SMEs supply chain flexibility
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research investigated the relationship between supplier integration and customer integration on operational performance by mediating supply chain flexibility in SMEs in Indonesia. The method used in this research used quantitative methods using a conceptual framework and analysis of research data was performed using structural equation models (SEM) with SmrtPLS 3.0 software tools. Respondents to this study were 650 SMEs owners in Indonesia who were determined using the simple random sampling method. Data collection in this study was carried out on primary data in the form of respondents' statements obtained from answers to online research questionnaires designed using a Likert scale of 7. The results of this study stated that Supplier Integration had a positive and significant effect on supply chain flexibility. Customer Integration had a positive and significant effect on Supply Chain Flexibility. Supply Chain Flexibility had a positive and significant effect on operational performance. Supplier integration had a positive and significant effect on operational performance. Customer integration had a positive and significant effect on operational performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it