Effect of pressure-shift freezing treatment on gelling and structural properties of grass carp surimi
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The damage of conventional freezing (CF) to the quality of surimi products is an urgent problem in the food industry. In the study, the effect of different freezing treatments [CF, pressure shift freezing (PSF), pressure-shift freezing pretreatment (Pr-PSF), unfrozen control] on gelling properties [gel strength, texture profile analysis (TPA), color], water-holding capacity (WHC) and protein structure characteristics of the grass carp surimi gel were evaluated and compared. Compared with other freezing treatment groups, surimi gel strength was increased three to four times after PSF treatment, which was mainly caused by the change in the microstructure and the WHC of the surimi gel. The study showed that PSF treatment could significantly improve the quality of the surimi gel and overcome the negative effect of freezing on the surimi gel. This indicates that PSF technology has a wide application prospect in the surimi gel processing industry, food processing and related material fields. Industrial relevance: PSF can enhance the commodity value of low-value freshwater fish products and has potential in surimi gel new product development. The development of new products and the use of new resources are very important in addressing the global food crisis and resource shortages. In addition, PSF units with self-cooling systems offer opportunities for scale-up and commercialization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it