MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386004210 · doi:10.26522/jess.v8i.4348

“Being represented in the game on your own terms”

2023· article· en· W4386004210 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Ryan Francis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Emerging Sport Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSport and Mega-Event Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousIce hockeyLeagueRecreationPolitical scienceNova scotiaBachelorOutreachMedia studiesSociologyMainstreamLibrary scienceManagementEthnologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ryan Francis grew up in Cole Harbour, Nova Scotia, Canada and is a member of Acadia First Nation. He played hockey in the United States while he completed an undergraduate degree in Sport Management before returning to Canada to obtain a Master of Physical Education in Administration, Curriculum, and Supervision. He is currently employed as Manager of Provincial Outreach and Coordination for the Nova Scotia Department of Communities, Culture, Tourism and Heritage in its Communities, Sport, and Recreation Division. He is also the first ever Visiting Indigenous Fellow at Saint Mary’s University where he is leading projects in research and community collaboration all related to Indigenous sport participation and education. Ryan is perhaps best known for having helped launch the Indigenous Girls Hockey Program Nova Scotia, a role that contributed to his nomination for the National Hockey League’s prestigious Willie O’Ree Community Hero Award. He wrote this essay in his capacity as a Mi’kmaw hockey player and sport administrator about his perspective on racism in hockey and how the structure of mainstream hockey in Canada perpetuates exclusion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score0.373

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0160.013
Scholarly communication0.0120.005
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.456
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Emerging Sport StudiesSame topicSport and Mega-Event ImpactsFrench-language works237,207