MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386006036 · doi:10.30652/jih.v1i02.1154

Pergeseran Peran Partai Politik Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 22-24/PUU-VI/2008

2013· article· en· W4386006036 on OpenAlexaff
Junaidi Junaidi

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Ilmu Hukum · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndonesian Election Politics and Participation
Canadian institutionsRegent College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegislaturePolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In section 214 UU number 10 year 2008 about generalelection legislative member determine chosencandidate stipulating determined by minimumboundary of acquirement voice 30% gratuity ofcommon denominator elector ( BPP), if the thresholdis not reached then further selected based on thedetermination of candidate sequence numbers. Basedon the decision of the Court Number 22-24/PUU-VI/2008 article is repealed. With this decision, the role ofpolitical parties is reduced to the determination ofcandidates elected in the general election. Party onlythe sharing to present its legislative candidate incandidate list, whereas determining chosen or is notchosen by elector.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.219

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0650.031

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Ilmu HukumSame topicIndonesian Election Politics and ParticipationFrench-language works237,207