Repercussões clínicas da ansiedade nos períodos pré e pós-operatório: revisão integrativa da literatura
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Anxiety is an emotional experience experienced by most individuals, it is a normal characteristic of the life of the human being, perceived by consciousness and evidenced by subjective feelings of tension, apprehension, nervousness and concern. The surgical procedure is perceived by the patient as an external threat and as such preoperative anxiety is an emotion commonly experienced by most patients who will undergo surgery. Anxiety in this period can cause physiological responses such as aquicardia, hypertension, high temperature, sweating, nausea, besides causing peripheral vasoconstriction. Objective: to synthesize the results obtained in research on the clinical repercussions of anxiety presented by patients in the pre and postoperative periods. Method: Integrative review of the literature, considering publications from the period 2012-2021, elaborated in six stages. Lilacs, BDENF and MEDLINE databases were used as sources of information. The controlled descriptors "anxiety", "preoperative period", "surgery" and "hospital" were used in the Portuguese, English and Spanish languages. Conclusion: we showed that the high levels of anxiety in the preoperative period are responsible for several important clinical repercussions both during surgery and in the postoperative period hospitalized in surgical clinic wards.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it