MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386020963 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3211233/v1

RayBNN: A 3-D Biological Neural Network Transfer Learning Model

2023· preprint· en· W4386020963 on OpenAlexaff
Brosnan Yuen, Xiaodai Dong, Tao Lű

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial neural networkTransfer of learningArtificial intelligenceMachine learningTrainCompetitive learningBase (topology)Deep learningTransfer (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Training large neural networks on big datasets requires significant computational resources and time. Transfer learning reduces training time by pre-training a base model on one dataset and transferring the knowledge to a new model for another dataset. However, current transfer learning algorithms are extremely limited because the transferred models always have to adhere to the dimensions of the base model and can not easily change the neural architecture to solve new datasets. On the other hand, biological neural networks (BNNs) are adept at rearranging themselves to tackle completely different problems using transfer learning. Taking advantage of BNNs, we design a novel neural network that is transferable to any other network architecture and can accommodate many datasets. Our novel approach uses raytracing to connect neurons in a three-dimensional space, allowing the network to grow into any shape or size. In the Alcala dataset, our transfer learning algorithm trains the fastest across changing environments and input sizes. In the future, this network may be considered for implementation on real biological neural networks to decrease power consumption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.207
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207