<i>De Novo</i> Cleaning of Chimeric MS/MS Spectra for LC-MS/MS-Based Metabolomics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purity of tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is essential to MS/MS-based metabolite annotation and unknown exploration. This work presents a de novo approach to cleaning chimeric MS/MS spectra generated in liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)-based metabolomics. The assumption is that true fragments and their precursors are well correlated across the samples in a study, while false or contamination fragments are rather independent. Using data simulation, this work starts with an investigation of the negative effects of chimeric MS/MS spectra on spectral similarity analysis and molecular networking. Next, the characteristics of true and false fragments in chimeric MS/MS spectra were investigated using MS/MS of chemical standards. We recognized three fragment peak attributes indicative of whether a peak is a false fragment, including (1) intensity ratio fluctuation, (2) appearance rate, and (3) relative intensity. Using these attributes, we tested three machine learning models and identified XGBoost as the best model to achieve an area under the precision–recall curve of 0.98 for a clear separation between true and false fragments. Based on the trained model, we constructed an automated bioinformatic platform, DNMS2Purifier (short for de novo MS2Purifier ), for metabolic features from metabolomics studies. DNMS2Purifier recognizes and processes chimeric MS/MS spectra without additional sample analysis or library confirmation. DNMS2Purifer was evaluated on a metabolomics data set generated with different MS/MS precursor isolation windows. It successfully captured the increase in the number of false fragments from the increased isolation window. DNMS2Purifier was also compared to MS2Purifier, an existing MS/MS spectral cleaning tool based on the addition of data-independent acquisition (DIA) analysis. Results indicated that DNMS2Purifier uniquely recognizes false fragments, which complements the previous DIA-based approach. Finally, DNMS2Purifier was demonstrated using a real experimental metabolomics study, showing improved MS/MS spectral quality and leading to an improved spectral match ratio and molecular networking outcome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".