MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4386032942 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.043018

Efficient fully precessing gravitational waveforms for binaries with neutron stars

2023· article· en· W4386032942 on OpenAlexafffund
Michael LaHaye, Huan Yang, Béatrice Bonga, Zhenwei Lyu

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Canadian institutionsPerimeter InstituteUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaInnovation, Science and Economic Development CanadaInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaGovernment of CanadaMinistry of Colleges and Universities
KeywordsPhysicsPrecessionNeutron starQuadrupoleBlack hole (networking)AstrophysicsBinary black holeGravitational waveSpin (aerodynamics)Compact starBinary starWaveformComputational physicsQuantum mechanicsStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We construct an efficient frequency domain waveform for generic circular compact object binaries that include neutron stars. The orbital precession is solved on the radiation reaction timescale (and then transformed to the frequency domain), which is used to map the nonprecessional waveform from the source frame of the binary to the lab frame. The treatment of orbital precession is different from that for precessional binary black holes, as ${\ensuremath{\chi}}_{\mathrm{eff}}$ is no longer conserved due to the spin-induced quadrupole moments of neutron stars. We show that the new waveform achieves $\ensuremath{\le}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}4}$ difference in terms of the one minus the overlap compared with waveforms generated by numerically evolved precession for neutron star-black hole systems for $\ensuremath{\ge}90%$ configurations with component mass/spin magnitude assumed in the analysis and randomized initial spin directions. We expect this waveform to be useful to test the nature of the mass-gap objects similar to the one discovered in GW 190814 by measuring their spin-induced quadrupole moments, as it is possible that these mass-gap objects are rapidly spinning. It is also applicable for the tests of black hole mimickers in precessional binary black hole events, if the black hole mimicker candidates have nontrivial spin-induced quadrupole moments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.462
Teacher spread0.442 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.→Same topicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research→French-language works237,207→