The Relationship of Student Academic Procrastination to Quarter Life Crisis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study partially explores the relationship between student procrastination and quarterly crises among undergraduates in the business education program at Pancasakti University Bekasi from 2020 to 2022. while judging empirically. This type of study is a descriptive study that explains or shows the relationship or influence between independent and dependent variables. The research subject consists of students who have completed a course of business education between 2020 and 2022. This study included a sample of 82 respondents, who distributed surveys in batches or via Google From, and each survey via his WhatsApp group. Sampling using non-probative sampling methods using targeted sampling techniques. Hypothesis testing using a simple linear regression test was performed in SPSS 20.0. The results of this study showed that the independent variable of academic procrastination was positively, though not significantly, associated with the dependent variable, quarter-century crisis. The results of this study show that thitung 0,05 Thus, the hypothesis of this study is Ho accepted and Ha rejected. It can be concluded that "academic procrastination is positively and slightly associated with quarter-life crises."
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".