MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386037059 · doi:10.12797/9788381389006.05

Self-identification v. Sport Neutrality: Indigenous Athletes and the Olympic Games

2023· book-chapter· en· W4386037059 on OpenAlex
A. S. E. Drabek

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueKsiegarnia Akademicka Publishing eBooks · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAthletesIndigenousCharterCITESOppressionPolitical scienceNeutralityIdentification (biology)Identity (music)Gender studiesSociologyLawMedicinePhysical therapyAestheticsArtFisheryEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The following article examines the 2021 controversy surrounding the OlympicCharter, specifically Charter Rule 50, and how it relates to Indigenousathletes. It cites various examples of Indigenous athletes who have representedAustralia and Canada at the Olympics, highlighting the ways inwhich they have tried to show their identity. It explains why showing tribalaffiliation is important for Indigenous athletes and communities. Finally,it argues that in the case of indigenous athletes, the ban on showing theiridentity is a manifestation of the ongoing oppression that colonized peoplesare subjected to.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.916
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it