An insight into the potential role of LINC00968 in luminal breast cancer: Case-control study and bioinformatics analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Luminal A and B subtypes of breast cancer (BC) comprises up to 70% of all BC patients. LncRNAs can affect many biological and pathological processes, and dysregulation of them is related to human cancers. The potential role of lncRNA LINC00968 in luminal BC is still unclear. Materials and methods: We analyzed the LINC00968 expression across 44 paired luminal BC tissues from the TCGA-BRCA RNA sequencing dataset. Besides, we used the GEPIA2 web server and GENEVESTIGATOR software, as well. Real-Time Quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) assay was performed to confirm the LINC00968 expression in 71 paired luminal BC tissues and two luminal A cell lines (MCF7 and T47D). Moreover, to better understanding the potential role of LINC00968 in luminal BC, computational data analyses including co-expression analysis, functional annotation analysis, and genetic alteration analysis have been done. Results: The results of data analyses retrieved from BRCA dataset and databases revealed the significant downregulation of LINC00968 in luminal A and B BC. Also, the results of qRT-PCR in luminal BC tissues and cell lines confirmed the earlier data. LINC00968 expression was negatively associated with tumor stage and lymph node metastasis. Additionally, functional annotation analyses revealed that LINC00968 might be involved in vascular development and angiogenesis, extracellular matrix organization, and cell motility and migration. LINC00968 might play role in some cancer-related signaling pathways. Conclusion: Our study found that downregulation of LINC00968 might promote tumorigenesis, invasion, and metastasis of luminal BC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".