MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386044324 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.08624

Local probe investigation of the spin dynamics in the kagome and inter-layers of orthorhombic barlowite Cu$_4$(OD)$_6$FBr: $^{79}$Br and $^{63}$Cu NQR study

2023· preprint· en· W4386044324 on OpenAlexafffund
Takashi Imai, Jiaming Wang, Rebecca W. Smaha, Wei He, Jiajia Wen, Young S. Lee

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersSLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryBasic Energy SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcMaster UniversityU.S. Department of EnergyOffice of ScienceNational Science Foundation
KeywordsAntiferromagnetismNuclear quadrupole resonanceOrthorhombic crystal systemCondensed matter physicsFrustrationQuadrupoleRelaxation (psychology)ParamagnetismSpin (aerodynamics)Phase (matter)PhysicsSpin glassPhase transitionNuclear magnetic resonanceMaterials scienceCrystallographyChemistryCrystal structureAtomic physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report $^{79}$Br and $^{63}$Cu nuclear quadrupole resonance (NQR) in the paramagnetic state above $T_\text{N} = 15$ K of the antiferromagnetic orthorhombic phase of barlowite Cu$_4$(OD)$_6$FBr consisting of a layered kagome structure. The divergent behavior of the longitudinal $^{79}(1/T_{1})$ and transverse $^{79}(1/T_{2})$ relaxation rates observed at $^{79}$Br sites evidences that critical slowing down of Cu spin fluctuations sets in below $\sim20$ K. This means that one or more Cu sites, most likely at the interlayer Cu(3,4,5) sites between the kagome planes, undergo the antiferromagnetic phase transition in a fairly conventional way. On the other hand, the $^{63}$Cu NQR signal intensity is gradually wiped out below $\sim30$ K, pointing toward gradual spin freezing of the kagome layers instead. These contrasting findings suggest significant roles played by magnetic frustration effects within the kagome layers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.510
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicAdvanced Condensed Matter PhysicsFrench-language works237,207