MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386051614 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346662

PDRs4All

2023· article· en· W4386051614 on OpenAlexafffund
Ryan Chown, Ameek Sidhu, E. Peeters, A. G. G. M. Tielens, J. Cami, Olivier Berné, E. Habart, Felipe Alarcón, Amélie Canin, Ilane Schroetter, Boris Trahin, Dries Van De Putte, A. Abergel, Edwin A. Bergin, J. Bernard‐Salas, Christiaan Boersma, Émeric Bron, S. Cuadrado, E. Dartois, D. Dicken, M. Elyajouri, A. Fuente, J. R. Goicoechea, Karl D. Gordon, Lina Issa, C. Joblin, Olga Kannavou, Baria Khan, Ozan Lacinbala, David Languignon, Romane Le Gal, Alexandros Maragkoudakis, Raphaël Meshaka, Yoko Okada, Takashi Onaka, Sofia Pasquini, Marc W. Pound, Massimo Robberto, M. Röllig, Bethany Schefter, Thiébaut Schirmer, S. Vicente, Marion Zannese, Isabel Aleman, L. J. Allamandola, Rebecca Auchettl, G. A. Baratta, Salma Bejaoui, Partha P. Bera, J. H. Black, F. Boulanger, Jordy Bouwman, Bernhard R. Brandl, Philippe Bréchignac, Sandra Brünken, Mridusmita Buragohain, Andrew M. Burkhardt, Alessandra Candian, S. Cazaux, J. Cernicharo, M. Chabot, Shubhadip Chakraborty, Jason Champion, Sean W. J. Colgan, Ilsa R. Cooke, A. Coutens, N. L. J. Cox, Karine Demyk, Jennifer L. Donovan, Sacha Foschino, P. García-Lario, Lisseth Gavilan, Maryvonne Gérin, C. A. Gottlieb, P. Guillard, A. Gusdorf, Patrick Hartigan, Jinhua He, Eric Herbst, Liv Hornekær, C. Jäger, E. Janot-Pacheco, Michael J. Kaufman, F. Kemper, Sarah Kendrew, M. S. Kirsanova, Pamela Klaassen, Sun Kwok, Á. Labiano, Thomas S. -Y. Lai, Timothy J. Lee, B. Leflóch, Franck Le Petit, Aigen Li, H. Linz, Cameron J. Mackie, S. C. Madden, Joe̋lle Mascetti, Brett A. McGuire, Pablo Merino, Elisabetta R. Micelotta, K. A. Misselt, Jon A. Morse, G. Mulas, Naslim Neelamkodan, Ryou Ohsawa, A. Omont, R. Paladini, M. E. Palumbo, Amit Pathak, Y. J. Pendleton, Annemieke Petrignani, Thomas Pino, E. Puga, Naseem Rangwala, Mathias Rapacioli, Alessandra Ricca, Julia Román-Duval, Joseph Roser, E. Roueff, Gaël Rouillé, Farid Salama, Dinalva A. Sales, Karin Sandström, P. J. Sarre, Ella Sciamma-O’Brien, K. Sellgren, S. Shenoy, D. Teyssier, Richard Thomas, Aditya Togi, L. Verstraete, Adolf N. Witt, A. Wootten, Henning Zettergren, Yong Zhang, Z. Zhang, Junfeng Zhen

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónScience and Engineering Research BoardJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAmes Research CenterUnited Arab Emirates UniversityCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueVetenskapsrådetChinese Academy of Sciences South America Center for AstronomyCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesBanaras Hindu UniversityNuclear Safety and Security CommissionDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaSpace Telescope Science InstituteNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekEuropean CommissionCanadian Space AgencySan José State UniversityDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftStrongNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context . Mid-infrared observations of photodissociation regions (PDRs) are dominated by strong emission features called aromatic infrared bands (AIBs). The most prominent AIBs are found at 3.3, 6.2, 7.7, 8.6, and 11.2 µm. The most sensitive, highest-resolution infrared spectral imaging data ever taken of the prototypical PDR, the Orion Bar, have been captured by JWST. These high-quality data allow for an unprecedentedly detailed view of AIBs. Aims . We provide an inventory of the AIBs found in the Orion Bar, along with mid-IR template spectra from five distinct regions in the Bar: the molecular PDR (i.e. the three H 2 dissociation fronts), the atomic PDR, and the H II region. Methods . We used JWST NIRSpec IFU and MIRI MRS observations of the Orion Bar from the JWST Early Release Science Program, PDRs4All (ID: 1288). We extracted five template spectra to represent the morphology and environment of the Orion Bar PDR. We investigated and characterised the AIBs in these template spectra. We describe the variations among them here. Results . The superb sensitivity and the spectral and spatial resolution of these JWST observations reveal many details of the AIB emission and enable an improved characterization of their detailed profile shapes and sub-components. The Orion Bar spectra are dominated by the well-known AIBs at 3.3, 6.2, 7.7, 8.6, 11.2, and 12.7 µm with well-defined profiles. In addition, the spectra display a wealth of weaker features and sub-components. The widths of many AIBs show clear and systematic variations, being narrowest in the atomic PDR template, but showing a clear broadening in the H II region template while the broadest bands are found in the three dissociation front templates. In addition, the relative strengths of AIB (sub-)components vary among the template spectra as well. All AIB profiles are characteristic of class A sources as designated by Peeters (2022, A&A, 390, 1089), except for the 11.2 µm AIB profile deep in the molecular zone, which belongs to class B 11.2 . Furthermore, the observations show that the sub-components that contribute to the 5.75, 7.7, and 11.2 µm AIBs become much weaker in the PDR surface layers. We attribute this to the presence of small, more labile carriers in the deeper PDR layers that are photolysed away in the harsh radiation field near the surface. The 3.3/11.2 AIB intensity ratio decreases by about 40% between the dissociation fronts and the H II region, indicating a shift in the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) size distribution to larger PAHs in the PDR surface layers, also likely due to the effects of photochemistry. The observed broadening of the bands in the molecular PDR is consistent with an enhanced importance of smaller PAHs since smaller PAHs attain a higher internal excitation energy at a fixed photon energy. Conclusions . Spectral-imaging observations of the Orion Bar using JWST yield key insights into the photochemical evolution of PAHs, such as the evolution responsible for the shift of 11.2 µm AIB emission from class B 11.2 in the molecular PDR to class A 11.2 in the PDR surface layers. This photochemical evolution is driven by the increased importance of FUV processing in the PDR surface layers, resulting in a “weeding out” of the weakest links of the PAH family in these layers. For now, these JWST observations are consistent with a model in which the underlying PAH family is composed of a few species: the so-called ‘grandPAHs’.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.849
Threshold uncertainty score0.732

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations106
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207