GRaM-X: a new GPU-accelerated dynamical spacetime GRMHD code for Exascale computing with the Einstein Toolkit
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We present GRaM-X ( G eneral R elativistic a ccelerated M agnetohydrodynamics on AMRe X ), a new GPU-accelerated dynamical-spacetime general relativistic magnetohydrodynamics (GRMHD) code which extends the GRMHD capability of Einstein Toolkit to GPU-based exascale systems. GRaM-X supports 3D adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) on GPUs via a new AMR driver for the Einstein Toolkit called CarpetX which in turn leverages AMReX , an AMR library developed for use by the United States DOE’s Exascale Computing Project. We use the Z4c formalism to evolve the Einstein equations and the Valencia formulation to evolve the equations of GRMHD. GRaM-X supports both analytic as well as tabulated equations of state. We implement TVD and WENO reconstruction methods as well as the HLLE Riemann solver. We test the accuracy of the code using a range of tests on static spacetime, e.g. 1D magnetohydrodynamics shocktubes, the 2D magnetic rotor and a cylindrical explosion, as well as on dynamical spacetimes, i.e. the oscillations of a 3D Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkhof star. We find excellent agreement with analytic results and results of other codes reported in literature. We also perform scaling tests and find that GRaM-X shows a weak scaling efficiency of ∼40%–50% on 2304 nodes (13824 NVIDIA V100 GPUs) with respect to single-node performance on OLCF’s supercomputer Summit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".