Le forum de coélaboration de connaissances : source d’inspiration et de soutien à la rédaction d’un récit en cinq temps aux 2e et 3e cycles du primaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le Forum de coélaboration de connaissances (FCC) est un outil de communication asynchrone qui permet l’appropriation de connaissances par la lecture et l’écriture de notes exprimant la pensée (Catel, 2001). L’article présente les résultats de l’apport de ce dispositif d’écriture collaborative pour soutenir l’énonciation d’idées lors de la rédaction individuelle d’un récit en cinq temps chez des élèves du primaire. Ces résultats, obtenus dans le cadre d’une recherche-action, tendent à mettre en lumière le potentiel d’une écriture collaborative soutenue par le FCC pour fournir des idées aux élèves lorsqu’ils sont ensuite soumis à une tâche individuelle d’écriture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".