MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4386055779 · doi:10.1101/2023.08.21.23294391

Moderate-to-vigorous Intensity Physical Activity and Incident Left-sided Degenerative Valvular Heart Disease

2023· preprint· en· W4386055779 on OpenAlexafffund
Ziang Li, Sijing Cheng, Bo Guo, Lu Ding, Yu Liang, Yinghan Shen, Jinyue Li, Yiqing Hu, Tianxin Long, Xinli Guo, Junbo Ge, Runlin Gao, Philippe Pîbarot, Bin Zhang, Haiyan Xu, Marie‐Annick Clavel, Yongjian Wu

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchChinese Academy of Medical SciencesChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsMedicineCohortHazard ratiovalvular heart diseaseIncidence (geometry)Internal medicineCardiologyProportional hazards modelPhysical therapyConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Despite the escalating incidence of degenerative valvular heart disease (VHD), recommended preventive interventions are conspicuously absent. Physical activity has proven effective in preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, but its role in preventing VHD remains uncertain. This study aimed to explore the association between moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) and incident left-sided degenerative VHD in middle-aged adults from the UK biobank. Methods Data from wrist-worn accelerometer and self-reported questionnaires were utilized to assess the impact of MVPA volume on the incidence of aortic valve stenosis (AS), aortic valve regurgitation (AR), and mitral valve regurgitation (MR). Incident VHD were ascertained from hospital admissions and death reports. Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle risk factors, and comorbidities. Results In the accelerometer-derived MVPA cohort (n=90,865; median age 63; 43% male; median follow-up 8.1 years), the age- and sex-adjusted incidence rates per 1000 person-years were 0.70 for AS, 0.29 for AR, and 0.84 for MR. In the questionnaire-based MVPA cohort (n=397,335; median age 57; 47% male; median follow-up 13.8 years), the corresponding rates were 0.76 for AS, 0.29 for AR, and 0.76 for MR. The accelerometer-measured MVPA volume showed a curvilinear relationship with reduced risk of AS, plateauing above 300 min/week. Participants engaging in 150-299 minutes of MVPA per week, meeting the guideline recommendation, had the most significant reduction in AS risk compared to those with no MVPA [adjusted HR, 0.53 (95% CI, 0.37-0.76)]. Similar results were found in the questionnaire-based MVPA cohort, with 150-299 minutes of MVPA showing a relatively smaller reduction in HR [adjusted HR, 0.82 (95% CI, 0.73-0.91)]. The association remained consistent across subgroups at high risk for AS. However, there was no significant inverse association of MVPA with risk of AR or MR. Conclusion Adhering to the recommended MVPA duration (150-299 min/week) was associated with the lowest risk of developing AS. Encouraging the utilization of wearable devices to monitor activity levels enhances AS risk reduction. Nonetheless, MVPA’s efficacy in preventing valvular regurgitation is limited, revealing distinctive pathological mechanisms in valvular stenotic and regurgitation lesions. Clinical Perspective What Is New? Engaging in 150-299 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity per week can reduce the risk of aortic valve stenosis by nearly 50% in middle-aged individuals. Using wearable devices to measure activity levels may improve the risk stratification of aortic valve stenosis compared to assessments based on questionnaires. No significant association is observed between moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity and risks of aortic valve regurgitation and mitral valve regurgitation. What Are the Clinical Implications? Objective activity monitoring through wearable devices shows promise as an effective nonpharmaceutical intervention to alleviate the healthcare burdens associated with aortic valve stenosis. Encouraging middle-aged individuals at higher risk for aortic valve stenosis to engage in moderate volume (150-299 minutes per week) and moderate intensity physical activity (e.g., walking at a speed of 2.5 miles per hour) is recommended. Engaging in physical activity beyond the recommended volume and intensity does not yield additional benefits nor pose additional risks for aortic valve stenosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors→French-language works237,207→