Enhancing water use efficiency in precision irrigation: data-driven approaches for addressing data gaps in time series
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Real-time soil matric potential measurements for determining potato production's water availability are currently used in precision irrigation. It is well known that managing irrigation based on soil matric potential (SMP) helps increase water use efficiency and reduce crop environmental impact. Yet, SMP monitoring presents challenges and sometimes leads to gaps in the collected data. This research sought to address these data gaps in the SMP time series. Using meteorological and field measurements, we developed a filtering and imputation algorithm by implementing three prominent predictive models in the algorithm to estimate missing values. Over 2 months, we gathered hourly SMP values from a field north of the Péribonka River in Lac-Saint-Jean, Québec, Canada. Our study evaluated various data input combinations, including only meteorological data, SMP measurements, or a mix of both. The Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) model proved the most effective among the tested models. It outperformed the k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN) model and the Evolutionary Optimized Inverse Distance Method (gaIDW). The ELM model, with five inputs comprising SMP measurements, achieved a correlation coefficient of 0.992, a root-mean-square error of 0.164 cm, a mean absolute error of 0.122 cm, and a Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency of 0.983. The ELM model requires at least five inputs to achieve the best results in the study context. These can be meteorological inputs like relative humidity, dew temperature, land inputs, or a combination of both. The results were within 5% of the best-performing input combination we identified earlier. To mitigate the computational demands of these models, a quicker baseline model can be used for initial input filtering. With this method, we expect the output from simpler models such as gaIDW and kNN to vary by no more than 20%. Nevertheless, this discrepancy can be efficiently managed by leveraging more sophisticated models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".