MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386070846 · doi:10.11159/eee23.105

FS8 Power System Anomaly Protection and Recovery Design

2023· article· en· W4386070846 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid and Power Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePower (physics)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Power Control Unit (PCU) in the satellite is to condition energy from the solar arrays and distribute power for all subsystems on the satellite. In order to provide power control and distribution functions in FS8 spacecraft, great reliability and failure recovery for PCU is necessary during the 3-years mission life. Once the spacecraft encounters unknown anomalies and approaches the depletion of the spacecraft battery on-board, the PCU can enter a master emergency condition and introduces PCU master lockout, i.e. spacecraft lockout to dormancy. The spacecraft can be recovered if the space power condition is back to normal. Battery (MainBus) voltage values are monitored to protect the battery from over-charging. Some enable-flags are connected to prevent critical components from activating in accidents, e.g. solar array deployment mechanism. In this paper, we will discuss PCU hardware anomaly protection and software recovery Fault Detection, Isolation, and Recovery (FDIR).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.495
Threshold uncertainty score0.504

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it