Real-time Interfacing of a Pneumatically-actuated Finger-thumb Rehabilitation Device
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rehabilitation of manual dexterity of patients with sensory motor impairments of the upper extremity due to stroke requires task-specific and repetitive exercises to facilitate recovery of a function.Given that patients require a considerable amount of time in therapy, it is essential that the rehabilitation devices are engaging and game-based to prevent the boredom of long-term repetitive task practice exercise regimes.In this study, an easy-to-use finger-thumb mechanism is designed that supports the index and middle fingers, and the thumb for patients with hand injuries.The device is connected to a game wirelessly, allowing patients to interact in real time with engaging computer games using goal-directed thumb and finger movements.The connection is established using two Raspberry Pi boards with the aid of a server-client network.The device also provides assistive-resistive forces during the game to assist or challenge patients depending on the state of their motor control.The slight delay of 10 ms for data transfer and 50 ms for game event updates enables the patients to play the game and modify the game events in real time, using the wearable device.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".