MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386070861 · doi:10.11159/icbes23.162

Front-End Circuit For Six ECG Precordial Leads, With Signal Processing And Graphic Interface

2023· article· en· W4386070861 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Valentina Bastida, Marco S. Estrada

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecordial examinationFront and back endsInterface (matter)SIGNAL (programming language)Computer scienceFront (military)Electrical engineeringSignal processingElectronic engineeringComputer hardwareEngineeringDigital signal processingElectrocardiographyMechanical engineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On this paper we propose a system for 6 precordial ECG leads acquisition, the system intends to offer a portable, stable, and low noise electrocardiograph, energized with a self-designed power source focused on biopotential signals conditioning and a mean for transmission, storage, and processing the signals.The whole system consists of a development board that has the low noise power source and a microcontroller for data digitization, a 6 precordial lead acquisition system with patient security circuit complying with IEC normative, an USB-TTL communication device for data transmission, and a graphic interface for managing, saving and signal processing.This work focuses on the integration of a whole system that could significantly ease the acquisition and processing of ECG signals, and on making the system viable for portable applications, also it intends to facilitate the recognition of some valuable characteristics of the signals, so that it can be used on places where there are no specialty doctors, and people can be faster addressed to be treated for possible cardiac diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.228

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0680.029

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and ScienceSame topicECG Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207