MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386071020 · doi:10.11159/htff23.218

Numerical Investigation Of Heat Transfer And Fluid Flow Characteristics Of Al2O3 Nanofluid In A Double Tube Heat Exchanger With Turbulator Insertion

2023· article· en· W4386071020 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ebrahim Tavousi, Noel Perera, Dominic Flynn, Reaz Hasan

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanofluidTurbulatorHeat transferMaterials scienceHeat exchangerMechanicsTube (container)Flow (mathematics)Computational fluid dynamicsHeat transfer enhancementThermodynamicsReynolds numberHeat transfer coefficientTurbulenceComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the primary objectives associated with the double tube heat exchanger is to enhance the heat transfer rate and improve the overall system performance.A promising approach to achieve these improvements involves combining turbulator insertion and nanofluid techniques.This study presents a numerical investigation that examines the impact of Al2O3-water nanofluid within the inner tube, along with turbulator insertion in the form of square-shaped ribs, on the heat transfer and fluid flow characteristics of the double tube heat exchanger.The findings indicate that an increase in the volume fraction of nanofluid leads to an enhanced heat transfer rate.Additionally, reducing the spacing between the turbulator ribs in the double tube heat exchanger results in an increase of up to 50% in the Nusselt number compared to a heat exchanger without turbulator insertion.The maximum performance evaluation criterion achieved in this study is 1.05.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.803

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material EngineeringSame topicNanofluid Flow and Heat TransferFrench-language works237,207