MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386072366 · doi:10.1109/mdm58254.2023.00017

Utilization of Spatio-Temporal and Social Information for POI Group Recommendation

2023· article· en· W4386072366 on OpenAlexaff
Pengyu Niu, Boting Qu, Jun Feng, Xin Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRecommender Systems and Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceGroup (periodic table)World Wide WebInformation retrievalData science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

POI group recommendation offers a list of locations to a group of users based on their visiting preferences, which is crucial for Location-Based Social Networks(LBSNs) to improve user experience quality and group satisfaction. Current studies either regard the POI as a general item for group recommendation, or do not make full use of the geospatial information of POIs and users’ social friends’ information to generate the group visiting preference representations. In this paper, a neural network-based POI group recommendation method named STSPGR is proposed. STSPGR first learns the user embedding vector that fuses temporal, spatial, categorical, and social information to represent each user’s visiting preference. Then it utilizes the attention network to dynamically learn the impact degrees of each member in the group decision-making process to aggregate the group visiting preference embedding. Finally, the POI recommender decodes the group’s embedding to the preference scores over all POIs to make the recommendation. Experiments are conducted on three real-world datasets, which show that the proposed STSPGR has better recommendation accuracy than other POI group recommendation methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score0.172

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRecommender Systems and TechniquesFrench-language works237,207