Experimental Investigation of Wettability Characteristics with Low Surface Tension Fluids Using the Wilhelmy Plate Technique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dropwise condensation (DWC) research has been focused on water as condensing fluid. However, other types of fluids (e.g. alcohols, hydrocarbons, refrigerants) are often used in industry and they present a lower surface tension compared to the one of water (0.073 N m-1 at 20 °C). For a given fluid, a preliminary step to understand if an engineered surface can promote DWC is the measurement of the dynamic contact angles in moving contact lines. Usually, in the literature, surface wettability characterization is done with the sessile drop method. Nevertheless, when considering low surface tension fluids, contact angles are expected to become smaller and the sessile drop method cannot be used. From this background, a new experimental setup for the measurement of the dynamic contact angles has been designed and built. The objective is to realize a system able to perform accurate measurements of dynamic contact angles even with low surface tension fluids. The present experimental technique is based on the Wilhelmy plate method, which is considered the most accurate method to measure surface wettability and also gives the possibility to integrate the measurement system in a pressure chamber. The measurement technique has been validated in atmospheric conditions comparing its results with the ones obtained by the classical sessile drop method: the dynamic contact angles of water have been measured over a glass sample with a silane coating. The influence of the immersion velocity on the measured contact angles is also investigated. After validation, a series of measurements using ethanol (which displays surface tension equal to 0.022 N m-1 at 20 °C) and refrigerant HFE7000 (surface tension 0.013 N m-1 at 20 °C) have been conducted. Furthermore, a Lubricant Infused Surface (LIS) which guarantees a completely smooth surface without defects, has been fabricated. This surface is composed of micro/nanostructures that are subsequently coated with a hydrophobic layer and then filled with a lubricating fluid. The contact angle measurements obtained with the present new technique show very low contact angle hysteresis and thus high droplet mobility. These wettability characteristics can be favourable for the promotion of dropwise condensation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".