MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4386073070 · doi:10.5194/acp-23-9245-2023

Seasonal variations in the production of singlet oxygen and organic triplet excited states in aqueous PM <sub>2.5</sub> in Hong Kong SAR, South China

2023· article· en· W4386073070 on OpenAlexaff
Yuting Lyu, Yin Hau Lam, Yitao Li, Nadine Borduas‐Dedekind, Theodora Nah

Bibliographic record

VenueAtmospheric chemistry and physics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersResearch Grants Council, University Grants Committee
KeywordsSinglet oxygenAqueous solutionPhotoexcitationChemistryAerosolTotal organic carbonAbsorption (acoustics)Environmental chemistrySinglet stateExcited statePhotochemistryTriplet stateAnalytical Chemistry (journal)OxygenMaterials scienceAtomic physicsMoleculePhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photooxidants drive many atmospheric chemical processes. The photoexcitation of light-absorbing organic compounds (i.e., brown carbon, BrC) in atmospheric waters can lead to the generation of reactive organic triplet excited states ( 3 C ∗ ), which can undergo further reactions to produce other photooxidants such as singlet oxygen (1O2∗). To determine the importance of these aqueous photooxidants in secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation and transformation, we must know their steady-state concentrations and quantum yields. However, there have been limited measurements of aqueous 3 C ∗ and 1O2∗ in atmospheric samples outside of North America and Europe. In this work, we report the first measurements of the steady-state concentrations and quantum yields of 3 C ∗ and 1O2∗ produced in aerosols in South China. We quantified the production of 3 C ∗ and 1O2∗ in illuminated aqueous extracts of PM 2.5 collected in different seasons at two urban sites and one coastal semi-rural site during a year-round study conducted in Hong Kong SAR, South China. The mass absorption coefficients at 300 nm for BrC in the aqueous PM 2.5 extracts ranged from 0.49 to 2.01 m 2 g-C −1 for the three sites. Both 1O2∗ and 3 C ∗ were produced year-round. The steady-state concentrations of 1O2∗ ([1O2∗]ss) in the illuminated aqueous extracts ranged from 1.56×10-14 to 1.35×10-12 M, with a study average of (4.02±3.52)×10-13 M. At nearly 2 orders of magnitude lower than [1O2∗]ss, the steady-state concentrations of 3 C ∗ ([ 3 C ∗ ] ss ) ranged from 2.93×10-16 to 8.08×10-14 M, with a study average of (1.09±1.39)×10-14 M. The quantum yields of 1O2∗ and 3 C ∗ also spanned wide ranges across samples, with a range of 1.19 % to 13.74 % and an average of (5.19±2.63) % for 1O2∗ and a range of 0.05 % to 3.24 % and an average of (0.56±0.66) % for 3 C ∗ . The [1O2∗]ss and [ 3 C ∗ ] ss correlated with the concentration and absorbance of BrC, thus implying that the amount of BrC drives the steady-state concentrations of these photooxidants. The locations (urban vs. semi-rural) did not have a significant effect on [ 3 C ∗ ] ss and [1O2∗]ss, which indicated that BrC from local sources did not have a significant influence on the year-round 3 C ∗ and 1O2∗ production. 3 C ∗ and 1O2∗ production were found to be the highest in winter and the lowest in summer for all three sites. The observed seasonal trends of 1O2∗ and 3 C ∗ production could be attributed to the seasonal variations in the long-range air mass transport. Our analysis highlighted the key role that regional sources play in influencing the composition and concentrations of water-soluble BrC in winter PM 2.5 in Hong Kong SAR, which contributed to their highest 3 C ∗ and 1O2∗ production. The current results will be useful for modeling seasonal aqueous organic aerosol photochemistry in the South China region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score0.362

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAtmospheric chemistry and physics→Same topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols→French-language works237,207→