MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

P924: TREATMENT PATTERNS OF TRIPLE-CLASS REFRACTORY (TCR) MULTIPLE MYELOMA (MM) ACROSS THE UNITED STATES (US), CANADA, AND WESTERN EUROPE: A REAL-WORLD OBSERVATIONAL CHART REVIEW STUDY

2023· article· en· W4386074452 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
RK Goyal, Gaelle Frugier, Julien Rombi, Keith L. Davis, Patrick Hlavacek, Jinma Ren, Alex Schepart, Didem Aydin, Marco DiBonaventura

Bibliographic record

VenueHemaSphere · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineRefractory (planetary science)Multiple myelomaPediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Topic: 14. Myeloma and other monoclonal gammopathies - Clinical Background: Most patients with MM eventually become refractory to the three main therapy classes used to treat the disease: proteasome inhibitors (PIs), immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Aims: The objective of the present study was to describe the management of patients who have become TCR and how treatment strategies vary across countries. Methods: A retrospective chart review study was conducted across the US, Canada (CA), the UK, France (FR), Germany (DE), Spain (ES), Belgium (BE), the Netherlands (NL), and Sweden (SE). Oncologists/hematologists were recruited to abstract medical chart information from eligible patients (eg, diagnosed with MM, clinician-reported refractoriness to ≥1 IMiD, ≥1 PI, and ≥1 anti-CD38 antibody treatment) into an electronic case report form. Patients had to initiate their first (index) therapy after becoming TCR between 11/1/2015 and 12/31/2019. Chart abstractions were performed from February through October 2022. Demographics, baseline clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns were descriptively analyzed. Results: A total of 718 patients with TCR MM were included (61.4% male; median age at index=64.2 years); 25.8% had an ECOG score of 2 and 28.7% had high cytogenetic risk [ie, t(4:14), t(14:16), and/or del(17p)]. Patients received a median of 3 treatment lines prior to their index therapy (19.4% were penta-exposed). In the post TCR setting, the most frequently used treatments included IMiDs (52.5%), PIs (40.8%), chemotherapy (CT; 27.3%), and mAbs (16.3%). Treatment class usage also varied significantly by country (Table 1). Summary/Conclusion: Our global chart review indicated that many patients reach TCR status after only a few lines of therapy and, after this point, retreating with IMiDs, PIs, and mAbs was common practice. The diversity of treatment classes used in this setting underscores the challenges across countries with managing a TCR population due to the lack of a clear standard of care.Keywords: Treatment, Multiple myeloma, Myeloma, Real world data

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.391
Threshold uncertainty score0.803

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHemaSphereSame topicMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207