MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386074562 · doi:10.11159/eee23.145

Early Epileptic Seizure Prediction Using EEG Signals with Machine Learning

2023· article· en· W4386074562 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Samet Oran, Esen Yıldırım

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectroencephalographyEpileptic seizureComputer scienceEpilepsyArtificial intelligenceSpeech recognitionMachine learningPattern recognition (psychology)PsychologyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Epilepsy is a chronic disease that dates back to ancient times and affects people only during seizures.Since the onset of seizures is unknown, it heavily poor affects the living standards of patients.If seizure onset can be predicted in sufficient advance, seizures can be prevented with drugs to be used or an opportunity can be provided for patients who cannot be stopped with drugs to move to a safe zone.For this purpose, to predict an epileptic seizure, before a certain period of time happens, frequency-based feature extraction is applied with the use of recorded EEG data.Bases of the study rely on creating time for patients to reach necessary medications approximately ahead 30-60 minutes before having an epileptic seizure.In this respect, an open-access dataset with 24 pediatric patients' EEG recordings was used and frequency-based feature extraction was performed using wavelet transformation.Afterward, classification performances of the features are compared for a k-nearest neighbor (k-NN), random forest algorithm (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and J48 which are extensively used machine learning techniques.In accordance with the classification results, the average highest accuracy was acquired as 99.87% with the SVM classifier.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.746
Threshold uncertainty score0.405

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and ScienceSame topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207