Fractionated radiotherapy for surgically resected intracranial meningiomas: A multicentre retrospective cohort study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aside from surgical resection, the only standard of care treatment modality for meningiomas is radiotherapy (RT). Despite this, few studies have focused on identifying clinical covariates associated with failure of fractionated RT following surgical resection (fRT), and the timing of fRT following surgery still remains controversial (adjuvant versus salvage fRT). We assessed the outcomes of the largest, multi-institutional cohort of surgically resected meningiomas treated with subsequent adjuvant and salvage fRT to identify factors associated with local freedom from recurrence (LFFR) over 3-10 years post-fRT and to determine the optimal timing of fRT. METHODS: Patients with intracranial meningiomas who underwent surgery and fRT between 1997 and 2018 were included. Primary endpoints were radiographic recurrence/progression and time to progression from the completion of fRT. RESULTS: 404 meningiomas were included for analysis. Of these, 167 (41.3%) recurred post-fRT. Clinical covariates independently associated with worse PFS post-fRT included receipt of previous RT to the meningioma, having a WHO grade 3 meningioma or recurrent meningioma, the meningioma having a higher MIB1-index or brain invasion on pathology, and older patient age at diagnosis. Subgroup analysis identified higher MIB1-index as a histological factor associated with poorer LFFR in WHO grade 2 meningiomas. 179 patients underwent adjuvant RT shortly after surgery whereas 225 patients had delayed, salvage fRT after recurrence/progression. Following propensity score matching, patients that underwent adjuvant fRT had improved LFFR post-fRT compared to those that received salvage fRT. CONCLUSION: There is a paucity of clinical factors that can predict a meningioma's response to fRT following surgery. Adjuvant fRT may be associated with improved PFS post-fRT compared to salvage fRT. Molecular biomarkers of RT-responsiveness are needed to better inform fRT treatment decisions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".