MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Multi-dilated Fusion Convolutional Neural Network for Fault Diagnosis of Rolling Bearings

2023· article· en· W4386077135 on OpenAlexaff
Yadong Xu, Ke Feng, Xiaoan Yan, Beibei Sun

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusKelowna General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvolutional neural networkComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Dilation (metric space)Field (mathematics)Fault (geology)Deep learningConvolution (computer science)Artificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is of great significance to implement real-time and effective condition monitoring and fault diagnosis for rolling bearings. Traditional model-based approaches rely heavily on previous experience and expert knowledge, which hinders their practicality in the industrial field. To cope with this problem, we develop a novel CNN mode called a multi-dilated fusion convolutional neural network (MF-CNN) for bearing fault diagnosis in this study. First of all, a CNN model with 1-D convolutional operations is developed to learn features directly from vibration signals. Then, a multi-dilated fusion module (MDFM) is developed to guide the CNN model to extract features from vibration signals at multiple levels. MDFM adopts dilated convolutions with different dilation rates to enlarge the receptive field. Finally, the MF-CNN architecture is built based on the above improvements. Some experiments are carried out to verify the effectiveness of the proposed MF-CNN. Experimental results suggest that MF-CNN outperforms some state-of-the-art approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.142
Threshold uncertainty score0.665

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207