MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386077525 · doi:10.1039/d3ja00166k

Evaluating calcium phosphate glass phantoms for the calibration of <i>in vivo</i> X-ray fluorescence spectrometry-based methods of bone strontium quantification

2023· article· en· W4386077525 on OpenAlexafffund
Matthew Micsa, Eric Da Silva

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicDental Radiography and Imaging
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaRyerson University
KeywordsStrontiumX-ray fluorescenceCalibrationFluorescenceX-rayCalciumChemistryMass spectrometryIn vivoAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Fluorescence spectrometryMaterials scienceRadiochemistryChromatographyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Calcium phosphate glass phantoms were assessed as candidate solid-state calibrators for in vivo X-ray fluorescence spectrometry applications as stable substitutes for plaster of Paris and hydroxyapatite.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Analytical Atomic SpectrometrySame topicDental Radiography and ImagingFrench-language works237,207