Efficient Rotating Synthetic Aperture Radar Imaging via Robust Sparse Array Synthesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rotating Synthetic Aperture Radar (ROSAR) can generate a 360° image of its surrounding environment using the collected data from a single moving track. Due to its non-linear track, the Back-Projection Algorithm (BPA) is commonly used to generate SAR images in ROSAR. Despite its superior imaging performance, BPA suffers from high computation complexity, restricting its application in real-time systems. In this paper, we propose an efficient imaging method based on robust sparse array synthesis. It first conducts range-dimension matched filtering, followed by azimuth-dimension matched filtering using a selected sparse aperture and filtering weights. The aperture and weights are computed offline in advance to ensure robustness to array manifold errors induced by the imperfect radar rotation. We introduce robust constraints on the main-lobe and sidelobe levels of filter design. The resultant robust sparse array synthesis problem is a non-convex optimization problem with quadratic constraints. An algorithm based on feasible point pursuit and successive convex approximation is devised to solve the optimization problem. Extensive simulation study and experimental evaluations using a real-world hardware platform demonstrate that the proposed algorithm can achieve image quality comparable to that of BPA, but with a substantial reduction in computational time up to 90%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".