MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386078194 · doi:10.1109/jlt.2023.3307504

Next-Generation O-Band Coherent Transmission for 1.6 Tbps 10 km Intra-Datacenter Interconnects

2023· article· en· W4386078194 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lightwave Technology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceOverhead (engineering)Transmission (telecommunications)Quadrature amplitude modulationElectronic engineeringForward error correctionModulation (music)Computer networkBit error rateTelecommunicationsPhysicsEngineeringChannel (broadcasting)Decoding methods

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the exponential growth of internet traffic, driven by the increasing number of connected devices and data-intensive applications, there is an urgent need to address the surging demand for higher capacity in datacenter communications. This paper proposes using O-band single-carrier coherent transmission to achieve 1.6 Tbps for intra-datacenter reach (2-10 km), leveraging the advancements in next-generation DACs and the TFLN platform. To support our proposal, we assess experimentally the gain of employing 256 GSa/s interleaved DACs compared to the current state-of-the-art 128 GSa/s DACs. Additionally, we explore the feasibility of utilizing cost-effective DFB lasers in these short-reach systems. Using the 128 GSa/s DAC and DFB lasers, we transmit 120 Gbaud DP-64QAM over 10 km of SSMF under the 20% overhead SD-FEC threshold, featuring a net rate of 1.2 Tbps. Switching to 256 GSa/s DAC, we achieve net 1.6 Tbps transmission over 10 km with 167 Gbaud DP-64QAM below the 25% SD-FEC BER threshold. We observe that the power penalty of using DFB lasers compared to ECLs is less than 1 dB. Furthermore, this study includes a comprehensive analysis of the power consumption envelope for various candidate configurations targeting 1.6 Tbps operation. The comparison reveals the competitiveness of the O-band single-carrier coherent solution, attributed to its simpler architecture and the inherent features of the TFLN platform. The analysis highlights the potential of the proposed solution as a power-efficient and high-performance option for meeting the demanding requirements of 1.6 Tbps Ethernet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.192
Threshold uncertainty score0.640

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it