MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386083831 · doi:10.3201/eid2909.230517

Rat Hepatitis E Virus in Norway Rats, Ontario, Canada, 2018–2021

2023· article· en· W4386083831 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sarah J. Robinson, Jamie Borlang, Chelsea G. Himsworth, David L. Pearl, J. Scott Weese, Antonia Dibernardo, Carla Osiowy, Neda Nasheri, Claire M. Jardine

Bibliographic record

VenueEmerging infectious diseases · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis Viruses Studies and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphPublic Health Agency of CanadaUniversity of British ColumbiaHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVirologyVirusGenotypeBiologyHepatitis virusHepatitis C virusHepatitis a virusHepatitis E virusMedicineGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

H epatitis E virus (HEV) is a nonenveloped, single- stranded, positive-sense RNA virus within the family Hepeviridae, subfamily Orthohepevirinae, which is divided into 4 genera: Paslahepevirus, Rocahepevirus, Chirohepevirus, and Avihepevirus (1).Human hepatitis E is primarily caused by Paslahepevirus balayani (genotypes 1-4), and infection generally causes an acute, self-limiting disease, but severe and chronic hepatitis and extrahepatic manifestations can occur in immunocompromised patients (2).Paslahepevirus balayani genotypes 1 and 2 are endemic in developing countries, circulating in humans and transmitted primarily via the fecal-oral route through contaminated drinking water.Sporadic cases of hepatitis E infection caused by zoonotic transmission of HEV (Paslahepevirus balayani genotypes 3 and 4) are increasingly reported in industrialized countries (3).Infections are acquired through direct contact with infected animals, environmental contamination with animal feces, and foodborne transmission from eating undercooked pork, venison, and wild boar meat (3).Additional HEV variants have been reported in a diversity of animal species, and zoonotic transmission from animal reservoirs is a growing public health concern.Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) have been shown to carry swine HEV (Paslahepevirus balayani genotype 3) and are natural reservoirs of HEV variants within the species Rocahepevirus ratti genotype C1 (rat HEV) (4).Since it was first detected in Germany in 2010, rat HEV has been identified in Norway rats from the United States, China, Vietnam, and 13 countries in Europe (5).Recently, cases of acute hepatitis caused by rat HEV have been reported in Hong Kong, Canada (infection acquired in Central Africa), and Spain (6-8).Those reports raise concerns regarding the potential risk for rat HEV transmission to humans and hepatitis E as an emerging infectious disease worldwide. The StudyWe conducted a study to investigate HEV infection in Norway rats from southern Ontario, Canada, and identify associations between host factors, season, land use, and year of collection.We obtained rat carcasses through collaboration with pest control professionals working in southern Ontario.Our rat and sample collection methods have been previously described and evaluated as a source of samples for zoonotic pathogen surveillance (9).We studied 372 Norway rats (species determined by external morphology) from 161 unique geographic coordinates within southern Ontario during November 2018-June 2021 (Figure 1).During necropsy, we recorded rat demographic characteristic data (Table ) and collected liver samples aseptically.Most rats in our sample were sexually mature (65%), and there were more females (51.2%) than males (48.8%).We noted the body condition of rats to be poor (emaciated or underconditioned) in 69.1% and good (well conditioned or overconditioned) in 30.9%.We could not determine sex (3%), sexual maturity (3.2%), or body condition (2.4%) in a minority of rats because of poor carcass condition.We categorized rats by collectionRat Hepatitis E Virus in Norway Rats, Ontario, Canada, 2018-2021

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score0.235

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEmerging infectious diseasesSame topicHepatitis Viruses Studies and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207