<i>Anaplasma bovis</i>–Like Infections in Humans, United States, 2015–2017
Bibliographic record
Abstract
T he genus Anaplasma includes several species of tickborne, zoonotic pathogens of global importance.Three recognized species (Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Anaplasma ovis, and Anaplasma bovis) and one provisionally named species (Anaplasma capra) are associated with moderately severe to severe disease in humans (1).Human infections with A. bovis, a pathogen first identified in monocytes of cattle in Algeria in 1936 and subsequently detected in other countries in Africa, Asia, and the Americas, were reported from China in 2017 (1-3).In 2015, a targeted metagenomic approach designed to amplify the V1-V2 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA (rrs) gene identified DNA of an A. bovis-like agent in blood specimens from 2 US patients with suspected tickborne illnesses (4).The agent demonstrated 100% identity across a 357bp region of rrs to A. bovis-like sequences amplified from several human-biting Dermacentor tick species in North America ( 4).An additional 2 US patients positive for this same Anaplasma species were identified in 2017 (L.Kingry et al., unpub.data), although the genetic identity of this pathogen remained limited to the same 357-bp sequence of rrs (5-7).To further characterize the phylogenetic position of this novel agent, we evaluated additional sequences to determine the uniqueness of this strain among the expanding global complex of A. bovis-like bacteria. The StudyWe extracted DNA from 100 µL of EDTA-treated whole blood obtained from 4 patients from whom partial rrs sequences of an A. bovis-like agent were identified from a targeted metagenomics assessment of whole blood specimens collected from US patients with suspected tickborne disease (4; L. Kingry et al., unpub.data).DNA extracts containing A. bovis DNA were also available from an adult Dermacentor andersoni tick collected in Saskatchewan Landing Provincial Park in Saskatchewan, Canada, and from 5 adult Dermacentor variabilis ticks collected in Washita County, Oklahoma; Floyd County, Iowa; and Sarpy and Cass Counties, Nebraska, from which partial rrs sequences most similar with A. bovis were amplified previously (5,6).We amplified segments of the rrs, citrate synthase (gltA), and heat shock chaperon (groEL) genes using Taq PCR Master Mix Kit (QIAGEN, https://www.qiagen.com)(Table 1).Each 20-µL primary reaction consisted of 1 µM of each primer, 10 µL Taq Master Mix, 2 µL DNA, and 6 µL molecular-grade water.Secondary reactions (groEL only) consisted of 1 µM of each primer, 10 µL Taq Master Mix, 1 µL primary PCR product, and 7 µL molecular-grade water.We resolved PCR amplicons on a 1% agarose gel in Tris-acetate-EDTA buffer and cut amplicons from the gel and purified using a Wizard SV Gel and PCR Clean-up kit (Promega, https://www.promega.com).We sequenced each purified amplicon (1 µL) bidirectionally Anaplasma bovis-Like Infections in Humans, United States, 2015-2017
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".