MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386088998 · doi:10.56112/sp.2016.1.04

Hlubočepy : Urban development of a Prague quarter

2016· article· en· W4386088998 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Karel Hudeček

Bibliographic record

VenueStaletá Praha · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrbanization and City Planning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)GeographyEconomic geographyRegional scienceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Urbanistické a architektonické kvality pražských Hlubočep, jejichž okolí patří z přírodovědného hlediska k nejdéle a nejsystematičtěji zkoumaným oblastem u nás vůbec, unikaly dosud soustavnější pozornosti památkové péče. I navzdory skutečnosti, že ve stavebním fondu staré vsi nenacházíme stavby kvalitativně srovnatelné s jinými obcemi pražského okolí, mohou Hlubočepy podat specifické svědectví o vývoji sídla zásadně formovaného průmyslovým rozvojem Prahy v druhé polovině 19. století. Nemenší význam pro jejich dnešní tvářnost měla i meziválečná regulace, jejíž cílevědomé naplnění vedlo ke vzniku vilové kolonie Žvahov. Oba tyto vlivy obohatily starší a v základních rysech dodnes dochovanou urbanistickou strukturu obce. Následující text pojednává o jejím vývoji a o specifických kvalitách hlubočepské zástavby.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.714
Threshold uncertainty score0.746

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStaletá PrahaSame topicUrbanization and City PlanningFrench-language works237,207