Bibliographic record
Abstract
Application Instituting Proceedings), General List No [] ICJ Rep Case Concerning the Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v Serbia and Montenegro), Judgment [] ICJ Rep Case Concerning East Timor (Portugal v Australia) [] ICJ Rep Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v Nicaragua) and Construction of a Road in Costa Rica along the San Juan River (Nicaragua v Costa Rica), Judgment [] ICJ Rep Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v Nicaragua), Compensation Owed by the Republic of Nicaragua to the Republic of Costa Rica, Judgment [] ICJ Rep Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru (Nauru v Australia), Preliminary Objections [] ICJ Rep Construction of a Road in Costa Rica along the San Juan River (Nicaragua v Costa Rica), Judgment [] ICJ Rep Corfu Channel Case (United Kingdom v Albania), Judgment [] ICJ Rep Eletronica Sicula, S.p.A (ELSI) (United States of America v Italy), Judgment [] ICJ Rep Gabčikovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary v Slovakia), Judgment [] ICJ Rep Interpretation of the Agreement of March between the WHO and Egypt, Advisory Opinion [] ICJ Rep Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion [] ICJ Rep Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in , Advisory Opinion [] ICJ Rep Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion [] ICJ Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v the United States of America), Judgment [] ICJ Rep Monetary Gold Removed from Rome in (Italy v France, United Kingdom and United States), Judgment [] ICJ Rep Nuclear Tests Case (Australia v France), Judgment [] ICJ Rep Nuclear Tests Case (New Zealand v France), Judgment [] ICJ Rep Obligations Concerning Negotiations Relating to Cessation of the Nuclear Arms Race and to Nuclear Disarmament (Marshall Islands v United Kingdom), Preliminary Objections, Judgment [] ICJ Rep Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v Uruguay), Judgment [] ICJ Rep Questions Relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium v Senegal), Judgment [] ICJ Rep xiv Table of Cases
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.362 | 0.077 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".