MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386095680 · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2023.2250443

Digital (In)justice in the Smart City <b>Digital (In)justice in the Smart City</b> edited by Debra Mackinnon, Ryan Burns and Victoria Fast, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 2023, 444 pp., $49.95 (Paperback), ISBN: 9781487527167

2023· article· en· W4386095680 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ed Hadfield

Bibliographic record

VenueInformation Communication & Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Cities and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomic JusticeSmart citySociologyInternet privacyBusinessPolitical scienceComputer scienceInternet of ThingsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Digital (In)Justice in the Smart City is a volume edited by Debra Mackinnon, Ryan Burns and Victoria Fast, that seeks to address what is now one of the key concepts within the field of urban planni...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0970.034

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInformation Communication & SocietySame topicSmart Cities and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207