U-Pb dating of pedogenic calcite near the Permian−Triassic boundary, Karoo Basin, South Africa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report U-Pb age determinations of carbonate nodules from an in situ paleosol horizon in the Upper Permian Balfour Formation and from several horizons of pedogenic nodule conglomerate (PNC) in the Triassic Katberg Formation, Karoo Basin, South Africa, using laser ablation−inductively coupled plasma−mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS). The paleosol sample yields an age of 252 ± 3 Ma, which overlaps with a previous high-precision U-Pb zircon date from a volcanic ash deposit 2 m above the paleosol. This relationship demonstrates the reliability of using LA-ICP-MS dating techniques on terrestrial pedogenic calcite. Two PNC samples collected at the base of the Katberg Formation within the same sandstone unit yield ages of 255 ± 3 Ma and 251 ± 3 Ma. The age of 251 ± 3 Ma overlaps with the high-precision U-Pb zircon date below the PNC and is a maximum age estimate of deposition for the base of the Katberg Formation. Our results show that reworked nodules in the same concentrated conglomerate lag can be of different ages, but that similarly aged nodules are spatially associated. In addition, two PNC samples collected higher in the section yield ages of 249 ± 3 Ma and 241 ± 3 Ma, providing maximum depositional ages for the lower to middle Katberg Formation for the first time. We demonstrate that pedogenic carbonate nodules can be dated with meaningful precision, providing another mechanism for constraining the age of sedimentary sequences and studying events associated with the Permian−Triassic transition in the central Karoo Basin, even though the extinction boundary may not be preserved in this area.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".