MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386102903 · doi:10.1016/j.jaacop.2023.08.002

A Population-Based Analysis of the Temporal Association of Screen Time and Aggressive Behaviors in Adolescents

2023· article· en· W4386102903 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Jasmina Wallace, Elroy Boers, Julien Ouellet, Patricia Conrod

Bibliographic record

VenueJAACAP Open · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicImpact of Technology on Adolescents
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersInstitut de Valorisation des DonnéesCanada First Research Excellence FundCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCentre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-JustineCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsAssociation (psychology)PsychologyAggressionPopulationDevelopmental psychologyDemographyClinical psychologyMedicineEnvironmental healthSociologyPsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: The recent widespread diffusion of screen-based devices among adolescents has raised questions about the effects of screen time on adolescent behavior, including aggressive behaviors. However, previous studies have been methodologically limited in their ability to distinguish between common vulnerability, concurrency, and lasting associations between screen time and aggression among adolescents, and findings are still inconsistent. To address this gap in the literature, time-varying direct and indirect associations between screen time and aggression were investigated. Method: The sample included nearly 4,000 Canadian adolescents who participated in annual surveys for 5 consecutive years. Multilevel statistical models were applied to study between-person effects (common vulnerability), within-person effects (concurrency explaining a priming effect), and lagged-within-person effects (lasting effects explaining a learning process) of screen time (ie, social media use, television viewing, video game playing, computer use) on aggressive behaviors (ie, fighting, conduct problems, hostile thoughts). Screen time effects on aggression through hostility were further studied. Results: Short-lived concurrent relations between different forms of screen time and aggressive behaviors suggested a priming effect. Social media use was further associated with longer lasting increases in conduct problems, suggesting a social learning process, while television viewing showed significant negative lagged-within-person association with hostility, showing a protective effect. Hostile thoughts mediated screen time and aggression associations mainly at between-person levels. Conclusion: The results suggest that the nature of the relation between screen time and aggressive behaviors depends on the type of digital platform through which such content is presented and suggest the need for policies focusing on protecting young users of digital media. Clinical trial registration information: Does Delaying Adolescent Substance Use Lead to Improved Cognitive Function and Reduce Risk for Addiction?; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/: NCT01655615.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAACAP OpenSame topicImpact of Technology on AdolescentsFrench-language works237,207