L’essai lyrique : une question de genre ? The Glass Essay de Anne Carson et Citizen de Claudia Rankine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Avec cet article, nous nous proposons de comparer les textes d’Anne Carson (The Glass Essay, 1995) et de Claudia Rankine (Citizen. An American Lyric, 2014) afin de montrer que, d’une part, le caractère hybride de ce que la critique anglosaxonne appelle désormais le « lyric essay » permet de dénoncer la porosité des frontières séparant le discours lyrique des discours savants ; et, d’autre part, qu’une telle dénonciation n’est pas suffisante pour reconfigurer l’espace littéraire. Tout en manifestant une attitude « critique » à l’égard du lyrisme, les deux œuvres analysées continuent en fait de s’appuyer sur l’alliance entre dimension individuelle de l’expérience et portée universelle de son expression qui est propre à ce genre au moins depuis le romantisme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".