MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386108371 · doi:10.1109/tmm.2023.3307933

Learning Representations by Contrastive Spatio-Temporal Clustering for Skeleton-Based Action Recognition

2023· article· en· W4386108371 on OpenAlexaff
Mingdao Wang, Xueming Li, Siqi Chen, Xianlin Zhang, Lei Ma, Yue Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Multimedia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHuman Pose and Action Recognition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCluster analysisArtificial intelligenceDiscriminative modelFeature learningPattern recognition (psychology)Regularization (linguistics)Machine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Self-supervised representation learning has proven constructive for skeleton-based action recognition. For better performance, existing methods mainly focus on 1) multi-modal data augmentations and 2) triplet contrastive samples construction. However, designing these strategies is always heuristics and hard. Instead of exploring more similar strategies, this paper addresses this issue with a different view and proposes a novel Contrastive Spatio-Temporal Clustering (CSTC) module. CSTC constructs a supervised signal (pseudo-label) of action sequences in an online clustering manner, and it is complementary to the recent data augmentations or triplet contrastive samples construction strategies. Specifically, CSTC can be formulated as an optimal transport problem. we introduce the spatio-temporal regularizations into the original optimal transport term to guide the pseudo-label generation, i.e., a semantic regularization learned by frame index is proposed to constrain the frame order, and a prior normal distribution regularization based on sampling characteristics of samples is proposed to maintain the dependability of spatial cluster assignments. Furthermore, to enhance the learning of latent features, we propose a Bidirectional Cross-modal Clustering Consistency Objective (B3CO) to enforce cluster assignments consistency for different modalities of the same sample. Last, since fusing spatial and temporal clustering losses directly during back-propagation will confuse the learned dimension-specific semantics, we propose a simple yet effective training strategy to fix it by training the model using these two losses alternately. By integrating the above designs into the MoCo framework, we propose a Contrastive Spatio-Temporal Clustering Network (CSTCN), which can excavate cross-modal discriminative spatio-temporal features in the clustering space. Experimental results on NTU RGB+D 60, NTU RGB+D 120, and PKU-MMD II datasets show that CSTCN achieves state-of-the-art performance in both single- and multi-modal models, especially in the KNN and semi-supervised evaluation protocols. Besides, the key module CSTC shows good generalization capability, and achieves consistent performance improvement on the basis of several state-of-the-art methods which focus on data augmentations and triplet contrastive samples construction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on MultimediaSame topicHuman Pose and Action RecognitionFrench-language works237,207