MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386108371 · doi:10.1109/tmm.2023.3307933

Learning Representations by Contrastive Spatio-Temporal Clustering for Skeleton-Based Action Recognition

2023· article· en· W4386108371 on OpenAlex
Mingdao Wang, Xueming Li, Siqi Chen, Xianlin Zhang, Lei Ma, Yue Zhang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Multimedia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHuman Pose and Action Recognition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCluster analysisArtificial intelligenceDiscriminative modelFeature learningPattern recognition (psychology)Regularization (linguistics)Machine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Self-supervised representation learning has proven constructive for skeleton-based action recognition. For better performance, existing methods mainly focus on 1) multi-modal data augmentations and 2) triplet contrastive samples construction. However, designing these strategies is always heuristics and hard. Instead of exploring more similar strategies, this paper addresses this issue with a different view and proposes a novel Contrastive Spatio-Temporal Clustering (CSTC) module. CSTC constructs a supervised signal (pseudo-label) of action sequences in an online clustering manner, and it is complementary to the recent data augmentations or triplet contrastive samples construction strategies. Specifically, CSTC can be formulated as an optimal transport problem. we introduce the spatio-temporal regularizations into the original optimal transport term to guide the pseudo-label generation, i.e., a semantic regularization learned by frame index is proposed to constrain the frame order, and a prior normal distribution regularization based on sampling characteristics of samples is proposed to maintain the dependability of spatial cluster assignments. Furthermore, to enhance the learning of latent features, we propose a Bidirectional Cross-modal Clustering Consistency Objective (B3CO) to enforce cluster assignments consistency for different modalities of the same sample. Last, since fusing spatial and temporal clustering losses directly during back-propagation will confuse the learned dimension-specific semantics, we propose a simple yet effective training strategy to fix it by training the model using these two losses alternately. By integrating the above designs into the MoCo framework, we propose a Contrastive Spatio-Temporal Clustering Network (CSTCN), which can excavate cross-modal discriminative spatio-temporal features in the clustering space. Experimental results on NTU RGB+D 60, NTU RGB+D 120, and PKU-MMD II datasets show that CSTCN achieves state-of-the-art performance in both single- and multi-modal models, especially in the KNN and semi-supervised evaluation protocols. Besides, the key module CSTC shows good generalization capability, and achieves consistent performance improvement on the basis of several state-of-the-art methods which focus on data augmentations and triplet contrastive samples construction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score0.906

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it