MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386115179 · doi:10.11159/htff23.166

Transient Buoyant Convection of A Highly Thermodependant Viscous Fluid in A 3D Cylindrical Drum

2023· article· en· W4386115179 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Charles Brissot, Rudy Valette, Arnaud Poulesquen

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDrumTransient (computer programming)MechanicsConvectionViscous liquidTransient analysisMaterials sciencePhysicsComputer scienceMechanical engineeringTransient responseEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study of the thermal behaviour of highly thermodependant fluids is primordial in the management of radioactive bituminous waste products (BWP) contained in drums. Bitumen has indeed a large thermodependancy: more than 6 decades in viscosity ratio between the hot and cold parts. To do so, a transient 3D convective system with the configuration of a constant temperature stress on the vertical boundary is considered. To estimate the key features of the physics involved, an analytical study is undertaken to draw a first general understanding of the system behaviour. Numerical simulations on a 3D Finite Element solver with the Boussinesq approximation are then carried out for various parameters to confirm the analytical results. Four phases are enhanced: a diffusive thermal choc, a vertical boundary layer convection, a global convection lead by the collapse of the cold inner core, and finally the heating of the remaining cold area by diffusion. Additional simulations with non-newtonian rheological laws (such as Hershel-Bulkley model) were also tested. The addition of a yield stress reduces the convection and thus the intensity of the second and third phases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material EngineeringSame topicFluid Dynamics and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207