MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386118870 · doi:10.1109/pn58661.2023.10222969

Soliton trapping and harmonic oscillations due to nonlinear interactions in optical fibers

2023· article· en· W4386118870 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Khajezadeh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Fiber Laser Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsSolitonPolarization (electrochemistry)OpticsDispersion (optics)Nonlinear opticsTrappingPulse (music)Optical fiberHarmonicQuantum electrodynamicsNonlinear systemQuantum mechanicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When the fiber dispersion is normal, there exists a pair of bright and dark solitons with orthogonal polarizations. When the power of the dark soliton (pump) on one polarization is stronger than that of the bright pulse (signal) on the other polarization, we found that the bright pulse is trapped into the dip of the dark soliton, and it undergoes harmonic oscillations if the mean frequency of the bright pulse is lower than a certain critical frequency. Otherwise, it escapes the potential well formed by the dark soliton. Analytical expressions derived for the frequency of harmonic oscillations and the asymptotic value of the trapped energy are in good agreement with numerical experiments. This result could have potential applications for ultra-fast all-optical switching and logic gates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.543
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Fiber Laser TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207