MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386119828 · doi:10.1108/oxan-db281467

Canada's new electricity emission rules face challenge

2023· article· en· W4386119828 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEmerald expert briefings · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear and radioactivity studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousElectricityFace (sociological concept)Investment (military)BusinessNuclear powerInternational tradePolitical scienceNatural resource economicsEconomyEconomicsEngineeringLawPoliticsSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance Achieving that target will require collaboration with provinces, territories, Indigenous partners, industry, consumers and other groups. Consultation around these new regulations would usually be politically uncontroversial but they appear likely to become part of a jurisdictional fight between Ottawa and the provinces. Impacts Conservatives will talk of federal overreach in Prairie and Maritime states but less so in central Canada, which already has green grids. The withdrawal of investment from oil and gas fields in Alberta and Saskatchewan will accelerate if the new regulations come into force. One consequence of the regulations is likely to be heightened interest in small modular reactors as a new source of nuclear power.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.746
Threshold uncertainty score0.940

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEmerald expert briefingsSame topicNuclear and radioactivity studiesFrench-language works237,207