MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386123528 · doi:10.36315/2023v1end092

ENTREPRENEURSHIP COMPETENCIES IN HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS: EFFECTS OF AGE AND GENDER

2023· article· en· W4386123528 on OpenAlexaffabout
Éric Yergeau, Marcelle Gingras

Bibliographic record

VenueEducation and new developments · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicEntrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEntrepreneurshipMathematics educationPsychologyComputer sciencePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Entrepreneurs are more than ever very important economic actors in all societies.In many countries such as Canada, governments are mobilizing school curricula to include activities aimed to develop entrepreneurship competencies in high school students.However, there is no clear data on the actual level of these competencies among high school students.This comparative study examines levels of entrepreneurship qualities in a sample of n=5527 high school students from the province of Québec and compares results with n=5309 adult subjects.Entrepreneurship is measured with the Entrepreneurship Qualities Questionnaire (EQQ, L'Heureux, 2000) which contains 59 items grouped in 6 continuous scales (Commitment, Motivation, Result-oriented, Creativity, Self-competition, Leadership).Results of univariate ANOVAs show a clear and strong linear relationship with age on all entrepreneurship scales.High school students have the lowest scores and older adults have the highest.There is some small effect of gender.These results suggest the importance of entrepreneurship contents in high school curricula in order to give opportunities for students to develop the fundamental competencies for becoming successful entrepreneurs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.138

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEducation and new developmentsSame topicEntrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesFrench-language works237,207