A generalizable new figure of merit for dose optimization in dual energy cone beam CT scanning protocols
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objective . This study proposes and evaluates a new figure of merit (FOMn) for dose optimization of Dual-energy cone-beam CT (DE-CBCT) scanning protocols based on size-dependent modeling of radiation dose and multi-scale image quality. Approach . FOMn was defined using Z-score normalization and was proportional to the dose efficiency providing better multi-scale image quality, including comprehensive contrast-to-noise ratio (CCNR) and electron density (CED) for CatPhan604 inserts of various materials. Acrylic annuluses were combined with CatPhan604 to create four phantom sizes (diameters of the long axis are 200 mm, 270 mm, 350 mm, and 380 mm, respectively). DE-CBCT was decomposed using image-domain iterative methods based on Varian kV-CBCT images acquired using 25 protocols (100 kVp and 140 kVp combined with 5 tube currents). Main results . The accuracy of CED was approximately 1% for all protocols, but degraded monotonically with the increased phantom sizes. Combinations of lower voltage + higher current and higher voltage + lower current were optimal protocols balancing CCNR and dose. The most dose-efficient protocols for CED and CCNR were inconsistent, underlining the necessity of including multi-scale image quality in the evaluation and optimization of DE-CBCT. Pediatric and adult anthropomorphic phantom tests confirmed dose-efficiency of FOMn-recommended protocols. Significance . FOMn is a comprehensive metric that collectively evaluates radiation dose and multi-scale image quality for DE-CBCT. The models and data can also serve as lookup tables, suggesting personalized dose-efficient protocols for specific clinical imaging purposes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".