MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386126677 · doi:10.1109/pn58661.2023.10223068

Chemical Imaging of Microparticles with Raman, FTIR and Quantum Cascade Laser Microscopy

2023· article· en· W4386126677 on OpenAlexaff
R. Rinfret, N. L. Rowell, Li‐Lin Tay

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiosensors and Analytical Detection
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaMétis National Council
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemical imagingRaman spectroscopyFourier transform infrared spectroscopyQuantum cascade laserMaterials scienceFourier transformMicroscopyNanotechnologyLaserImaging spectroscopyOpticsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Hyperspectral imagingOptoelectronicsChemistryComputer scienceTerahertz radiationEnvironmental chemistryPhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microplastic contamination of the environment and ecosystem has attracted much attention in recent years. Its presence has been detected in the most remote regions and its propagation through the food chain poses a serious health risk to humans and animals. To better understand their presence in the environment, their detection and identification plays a critical role in any remediation effort. FTIR and Raman imaging provide simultaneously size metrology and spectral information and have been gold standard tools for microplastic analysis. In this study, we will present state-of-the-art chemical imaging methods, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and Raman imaging as well as quantum cascade laser mapping, for the detection of microplastic particles. We will demonstrate enhanced detection through the use of reflective substrates and discuss the signal enhancement strategies of these chemical imaging techniques as well as their limitations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.201

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBiosensors and Analytical DetectionFrench-language works237,207