Wind pressure on a 45° gabled roof: verifying code provisions with field measurements and wind tunnel data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The wind load provisions for gabled roofs with a slope of 27° < α < 45° in the National Building Code of Canada (NBCC) were derived from wind tunnel studies conducted in the 1970s. The coefficients have remained basically unchanged until this time. The paper presents the results of full-scale measurements and wind tunnel experiments to verify the necessity to update the current NBCC provisions. A full-scale building with a gabled roof of 45° was instrumented with pressure taps, and the wind load was monitored for 15 months. Special attention is given to the roof overhang by considering the simultaneous pressure contribution from both the upper and lower surfaces. The building and surroundings were replicated at a wind tunnel scale and investigated by Concordia University and Western University. Based on these three sources of data, the study concluded that the corner and edge provisions for both cases—a roof with and without overhang—need to be increased. It is suggested to merge the corner and edge into a single “perimeter” load provision. This code simplification would help the roofing industry to reduce misleading interpretations of the code and minimize failure due to installation errors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".